Category: Arbeitsrecht

Entscheidung um Bahncard 100 für ein Betriebsratsmitglied ist nicht eilbedürftig

Entscheidung um Bahncard 100 für ein Betriebsratsmitglied ist nicht eilbedürftig

Im Rechtsstreit um eine Bahncard 100 für den Betriebsratsvorsitzenden eines Unternehmens besteht keine Eilbedürftigkeit. Dies entschied das Landesarbeitsgericht Köln in einem Beschluss vom 28. Juli 2022 (6 TaBVGa 4/22). Die Entscheidung im Hauptverfahren, ob der Arbeitgeber dem Betriebsratsvorsitzenden eine Bahncard 100 zur Verfügung stellen muss, da dies in einer Gesamtbetriebsvereinbarung so vorgesehen ist, steht noch

Termination without notice is possible if a forged vaccination certificate is presented

Termination without notice is possible if a forged vaccination certificate is presented

The Regional Labour Court in Düsseldorf has confirmed the assumption of many courts of first instance that the presentation of a falsified vaccination certificate entitles the employer to dismiss an employee in certain cases. However, dismissals in these cases are not a foregone conclusion and should be examined carefully. Anyone who falsifies their vaccination certificate and presents it to their employer must expect to be dismissed by the employer.

No entitlement to payment of an aggravation allowance under the collective agreement when wearing a simple surgical mask

Aggravation allowance for wearing a simple surgical mask

Employers do not have to pay their employees a collectively agreed hardship allowance if they are required to wear a simple surgical mask. This was decided by the Stuttgart Regional Labor Court in a ruling on March 23, 2022 (2 Sa 31/21). In the specific case, the employee of a glass and building cleaning company had sued for several hundred euros in aggravation pay. An appeal to the Federal Labor Court is

Unvaccinated nursing staff do not have to be employed in retirement homes

Unvaccinated nursing staff do not have to be employed in retirement homes

Care facilities do not have to continue to employ employees who have not been vaccinated against the coronavirus. This was decided by the Hesse Higher Labor Court in two rulings on August 11, 2022 (Ref. 5 SaGa 728/22 and 7 SaGa 729/22). Among other things, the decision was based on the fact that the mandatory proof of a coronavirus vaccination in accordance with the Infection Protection Act is a prerequisite for employment.

Categories



Law firm Haas and colleagues
Lawyers & tax consultants

Rudolf-Diesel-Str. 5
D - 65760 Eschborn

06173 - 318 170

info@haas-eschborn.de

To the contact form

Facebook - Haas and colleagues
Youtube - Haas and colleagues
Twitter channel Haas and colleagues

Contact the law firm Haas und Kollegen GmbH now:

Call now